News

Apple found liable for conspiring to fix e-book prices

Apple found liable for conspiring to fix e-book prices

A woman holds up an iPad with the iTunes U app after a news conference introducing a digital textbook service in New York in this January 19, 2012, file photo. Photo: Reuters/Shannon Stapleton/Files

By Nate Raymond

NEW YORK (Reuters) – A judge who found Apple Inc liable for conspiring to fix e-book prices entered an injunction on Friday to bar the iPad maker from further antitrust violations.

District Judge Denise Cote in Manhattan said Apple could not enter into agreements with five major U.S. publishers that would impede its ability to reduce e-book retail prices or offer price discounts.

The judge also said she would appoint an external monitor to review Apple’s antitrust compliance policies, procedures and training for two years.

The terms of the judgment will expire after five years, but Cote’s order allows for extensions in one-year increments if necessary.

The injunction followed a July 10 ruling by Cote finding Apple conspired with five publishers to undermine e-book pricing established by the dominant retailer in the market, Amazon.com Inc.

The five publishers, all of which have settled with regulators, include Lagardere SCA’s Hachette Book Group Inc, News Corp’s HarperCollins Publishers LLC, Penguin Random House LLC, CBS Corp’s Simon & Schuster Inc and Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holtzbrinck GmbH’s Macmillan.

The U.S. Justice Department, which sued Apple in April 2012, had initially sought an even broader injunction that could have touched on the company’s agreements with suppliers of other types of content, such as movies, music and TV shows.

But Cote had made clear at a hearing last week that she would not go that far, saying she wanted the injunction “to rest as lightly as possible on how Apple runs its business.

The Justice Department nonetheless welcomed the injunction.

“Consumers will continue to benefit from lower e-books prices as a result of the department’s enforcement action to restore competition in this important industry,” Assistant Attorney General Bill Baer said in a statement.

Apple said on Friday that it would appeal the injunction.

“Apple did not conspire to fix e-book pricing,” said company spokesman Tom Neumayr. “The iBookstore gave customers more choice and injected much-needed innovation and competition into the market.”

Shares of Apple were down 0.1 percent at $494.64 in morning trading.

The case is U.S. v. Apple Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 12-02826.

Recent Headlines

in Weird

Man posing as security guard steals $75K from Walmart

14-overlay3

The suspect was dressed in clothes similar to those of an armored truck employee and was able to walk out without raising suspicion.

in Weird

Police: Man shoots off firework from top of his head, dies

21-overlay2

A man celebrating the Fourth of July used his head as a launch pad.

in Weird

Woman’s parking citation tossed because of missing comma

parkingticket

An appeals court has agreed with an Ohio woman who said her parking citation should be tossed because the village law was missing a comma.

in Music

Anthrax producing limited edition bourbon

anthrax

The rockers have teamed up with Knob Creek.

in Music

Dave Grohl gets a giant throne for first gig back after breaking leg

foofighters

The Foo Fighters frontman returned to the stage in epic style.